Welcome!
What Kind of Church Is This?
Meet Our Team
Streaming Sermons
Back to School Festival
Baptism
Good People Don't Need Jesus
ACC Facebook
Events Calendar
Server Chart
Driving Directions
Contact Us

Leave Blog Feedback!  View Blog Feedback!

Archive Newer | Older

Thursday, February 26, 2009

The Biggest Question of Them All!
The last few weeks on Wednesday nights, we’ve been discussing the ramifications of the basic facts of the gospel: Jesus lived, died, was buried, rose again, and people believe in Him.  Because Jesus rose from the dead, our sins can be forgiven, we have hope beyond this life, and specifically, we’ll be resurrected when Jesus comes to earth for the second time. 

All of this discussion leads to a natural question: what happens in the meantime, after we die and before Jesus comes again?  That question was quickly asked, and I answered it quickly (and poorly - my sincere apologies for not being better prepared).  So, to supplement that discussion and to introduce the topic to those who were not there, I give you two types of answers: the short one and the long one (note: these are both the SAME answer; one is fleshed out in more detail for those people who like knowing details).  So, the question: what happens to people immediately after they die?
 

The Short Answer
 

The New Testament clearly spells out the promise that when we die, we go to be with Jesus, whom we’ve trusted, loved and followed in this life.  While He was on the cross, Jesus clearly promised one of this fellow criminals that he would be with Jesus in paradise that very day (Luke 23:43).  Furthermore, in his letter to the Philippians, Paul writes that while he would love to continue to preach on earth, he would much rather go on to be with Jesus (Philippians 1:23), and in his second letter to the Corinthians, while discussing a similar topic, he claims that being away from our bodies means that we’re in the presence of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:8).  So, for Christians, when we die, we go (spiritually) to be with Jesus until the Second Coming, when we are given new bodies and are with Him physically. 

The Long Answer
(tip of the cap to Gareth Reese and his Special Study in his commentary on Acts)
 

The first time we see mention of a ‘place of the dead,’ is all way back in the book of Genesis, where Jacob talks about going to Sheol to see his son (Genesis 37:55).  The word ‘Sheol’ is a Hebrew word, and its Greek equivalent, which is used in the New Testament, is ‘Hades.’  All throughout the Old Testament, we see men expecting to die and then go to Sheol/Hades, including righteous men, like Job (Job 17:13), David (Psalm 16:10) and Hezekiah (Isaiah 38:18).  Therefore, Sheol/Hades, for several thousand years, was simply the place where all dead people went after they died.  It was not good or bad, a reward or punishment; it was simply the next world after this one where people went to. 

In the New Testament, we learn that Jesus made a change to Sheol/Hades after His death and resurrection.  We’re told that He went to the normal place of the dead, though God did not ‘abandon’ Him, meaning He wasn’t there for good (Acts 2:26-28).  Instead, Paul’s letter to Ephesus seems to suggest that it was at that point that Jesus separated the righteous dead and the unrighteous dead: we read that when He ascended to heaven, He did not go alone, but instead took a ‘host of captives’ with Him (Ephesians 4:8).  This would fit perfectly into the time frame when Jesus was dead, but not yet raised, and would explain how Jesus could promise paradise to the rebel being crucified next to him (Luke 23:43).
 

Now, in the time after Christ’s death and resurrection, it appears that Sheol/Hades is the place where only those who do not belong to Jesus go to, while those who are Christians go to a different place with Jesus, who is reigning at the right hand of God (Acts 2:33).  A key passage is in the book of Luke, where we read of Jesus’ hypothetical scenario of Lazarus and an unrighteous rich man (Luke 16:19-31).  In it, we read that the unrighteous man is suffering in Hades (NOT Hell, as the KJV and NIV read; the Greek word is different than the word translated ‘Hell’), and Lazarus is at Abraham’s side in another place.  Both men can see the state of the other, but there is a ‘great chasm’ fixed between them that cannot be crossed.  This account, which may or may not be parabolic, suggests there is an intermediate place between life and the eternal states of heaven and hell, since we’re told the Lazarus is comforted (Luke 16:25), and in a perfect heaven, there would be nothing to be comforted from.  Therefore, we can assume this story is not describing the final and eternal state of either man.
 

At Jesus’ Second Coming, we’re told that every person will be resurrected (Acts 24:15) and given a new body (1 Corinthians 15:35-49).  Those who have belonged to Jesus will live with Him eternally on a renovated, perfect earth (2 Peter 3:10-13, Revelation 21), and those who did not will be cast into Hell with all of Hades, Satan, and his minions (Revelation 20:9-14).
 

The Bottom Line There is one reason, and one reason only, that the afterlife is going to be so amazing for Christians: we get to be with Jesus!  So many people see Heaven as this perfect place where nothing ever goes wrong, but the REASON everything is so great is that Jesus is there.  Here’s the point: if you’re planning on spending eternity in Heaven, then learning to passionately love and follow Him in this life is essential.  After all, when we do get there, His is the first voice we’ll hear, telling us ‘well done!’ (Matthew 25:21) 

That sounds pretty darned good to me!
2:12 pm 

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Caught in the Crossfire
Sometimes the deepest questions people ask have the simplest answers.  Sure, there are some questions- ‘Where did God come from?’ or ‘What would have happened if Adam and Eve never ate from that tree?’ or ‘What will it be like when Jesus comes back?’ - that have long, complicatedly convoluted answers because, at the end of the day, those questions are ultimately unanswerable.  But there are other questions that, for one reason or another, people fail to see the answer to, even thought it’s staring them right in the face.  One of those questions is this: 

‘Why do bad things happen to good people?’
 

Variations on this question can be ‘how could a loving God allow so much evil?’ or ‘if God is so powerful, how come so many tragedies happen?’  Regardless of how the question is worded, however, the answer is surprisingly simple, and it’s perfectly illustrated in our sermon this past Sunday.  As we finished our series on the life of David, a man after God’s heart, we learned from his greatest failure.  Often, we think of the accounts of 2 Samuel 11-12 as the story of ‘David and Bathsheba,’ when upon a closer look, we should probably call it ‘David Betrays Uriah.’  Considering Nathan’s parable and his subsequent criticism of what David had done (see specifically 2 Samuel 12:9), it appears that the heart of David’s terrible sin was how he treated his once dear friend.
 

As you’ll recall, Uriah was one of David’s ‘Mighty Men,’ (see 2 Samuel 23:39), and was a fantastic example of what it meant to be a good soldier, a good leader, and a good Jew.  In other words, no matter how you slice it, Uriah was one of those ‘good people’ that we always love to talk about.  He committed no crime, offended no one, and even went above and beyond the expectations of God and country to be loyal to his men and his king.  And what did he get for his trouble?  He was betrayed and brutally murdered, and as salt in the wound, he lost any shred of dignity that his name had when his wife married David only a week after his death.  The way David treated Uriah was an absolute tragedy.
 

The question, of course, is ‘why?’  The answer couldn’t be simpler: a bad thing happened to a good man because David chose evil over good.  David’s choice brought about negative consequences, not only in HIS life, but in the lives of others.  See, God has set his creation up as a community - we are all intertwined in this life.  Therefore, not only are effected, for better or worse, by OUR actions, but we are effected by the actions of others.  This is a truth that, short of living in on Antarctica, we all have to face.
 

But we still want to know ‘why?’  Why didn’t God stop David?  Why didn’t God warn Uriah?  Why didn’t God compel Bathsheba to confess?  Why?  I think a better question is this: why WOULD God do any of those things?  The simple fact is that we are the ones who are ultimately in control of our lives, and since we are an interpersonal community, we are ultimately in control of the live of other people.  It’s because of that fact that Jesus’ teaching almost universally dealt with how we treat each other - God has given us the ability to steer our own ship, and He’s not going to take that ability away from us just because our idiot decisions lead us straight into glaciers in the ocean.
 

None of this, though, changes the tragedy that was the end of Uriah’s life.  But you know what?  Uriah lived his life the best way he knew how, and he died standing on his faith and devotion to God.  His integrity cost him his life, because he got caught in the crossfire of David’s horrible decisions… but I suspect if he were writing this blog, he’d have no regrets about how he handled that situation.  I believe with all my heart that Uriah was perfectly content with his decision.  He understood that he made the choices he made not out of self-preservation, but because they were the right choices to make. 
 

And I imagine that God was smiling when he saw what Uriah chose.
3:38 pm 

Thursday, February 19, 2009

What's Your Motivation?
What is your motive for living your life the way you do?  It’s an important question, you know – and one day it could end up saving you.  The other night I couldn’t sleep, so I found myself watching a 3 AM episode of ‘Dateline’ on NBC.  In the episode, they told the real life account of a man who had been accused of putting out a hit on his son’s daughter.  The motive?  Racism – the man was a traditional Indian (from India, not North Dakota) who supposedly disapproved of his daughter in law’s black skin.  His main argument was that the motive was bogus, as he had many African American friends and had never shown any bigotry before (actually, scratch the part about ‘saving you.’  The man was convicted of murder.  Maybe it’ll work better for you one day…). 

At any rate, the case was all about motive, and when you think about it, people’s motivation can tell a lot about their actions.  A person whose main motivation is selfish will act in a different manner than one who is selfless, and a person who wants to help other people will make different decisions than someone who wants other people to help them.  A person who’s motivated by money or power will carry himself with a different attitude than a person who’s motivated by peace and contentment, and someone whose main motive is blind love and adulation of another person can justify nearly any action.  Our motives are what drive us to be the people we are, for better or for worse.
 

So, what should our motive be to live a Christian life?  Take it from a person who was divinely authorized to say ‘follow in my footsteps’ on multiple occasions (see Philippians 3:17, 1 Corinthians 11:1, etc.): one motivation of our lives should be sin.  That’s right – sin.  In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul lays out his argument concerning the life after this one: because of the basic gospel message that we believe and live, we can be assured that we will live forever with God in a resurrected, glorious existence.  As he makes his case, he offers an interesting aside: he is the least of all the apostles, because he is the only one who has persecuted the church the way that he did (15:9).  But instead of simply beating himself over the head with false humility or using his past as an excuse for failure, he did the opposite: he worked HARDER than any other apostle (15:10)!
 

In other words, Paul used his past mistakes as motivation to live a fruitful life in the here and now.  He knew full well what he was capable of, and he understood better than he would have liked that his actions had the potential for dramatic consequences, one way or another.  Therefore, it was all the more important, to him, that he used the time he had been given to lead other people to a saving faith in Jesus.  He allowed his mistakes to be a tool instead of a hindrance; after all, what better person to teach on love, grace and mercy than one with intimate experience in hate, wrath and punishment?  He knew where he’d been, and he knew the pain it had caused, and because of his knowledge on the subject, he made sure that not only would he never go back, but others would know the truth as well.
 

Maybe you can’t relate to Paul because you’ve never done anything ‘all that bad,’ or maybe his words about being the least of the apostles ring true in your heart.  Regardless, we are ALL capable of terrible actions, and we all need to be motivated by what we are without God.  The beauty is this: God doesn’t see us as the sum of our mistakes, and instead of dwelling on who we are not, he helps us to be who we are in the best way possible.  When we follow God, He can help us to make sure we’re never back in the dark places we’ve lived before.
 

All we need is motivation!
11:23 am 

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

David's Dancing
While writing last week’s sermon, I have to admit that there was a topic that had nothing to do with the point I was attempting to convey, but I continued to think about it… it’s all about our idea of ‘worship’ today, and specifically what we sing about on Sunday mornings. 

(Note: Before we go any further, let it be known that the sermon did NOT get recorded this week, as my mic battery died about ten minutes in.  For those of you who missed it, read 2 Samuel 2-6, and then read Matthew 6:19-21.  The point I hopefully made was that David’s intense celebration and subsequent humiliation was a result of a lifetime of investment into God’s plans.  For us, then, if we want to make the most of our relationship with Christ, we need to invest ourselves into what He’s doing in the lives of His people, and when we do that, we’ll share in the type of joy David had.) 

Whenever I read about David dancing in his underwear, I have to admit that I think about a song by David Crowder Band called ‘Undignified.’  The song was (I think at least) written in the spirit of this event, and quotes David’s words to his skeptical wife.  This song is just one of a gaggle of ‘worship’ songs that talk about dancing before God - in fact, if you listen to Christian radio enough, you might think that a pre-requisite to being a Christian is having an audition tape currently on the desk of the producers of ‘So You Think You Can Dance?’  Furthermore, in most of our ‘worship’ music, we learn that we should ‘bow down,’ and ‘lift our hands,’ all in an attempt to ‘feel God’s presence,’ ask God to ‘pour out his power and love’ and ‘touch our hearts’ and accept our ‘gifts and offerings’ to him.  This, we’re led to believe is ‘praise and worship.’
 

Now, full disclosure: I am, personally, the person who chooses each song in each service at ACC, so if any of this is humorous, then it’s my fault.  And yes, we regularly sing songs that send the message that I described in the last paragraph (more on that in a future blog post, I promise).  But I do think that, especially when it comes to David’s spontaneous act of devotion in 2 Samuel 6, there’s great irony in trying to hold him up as an example.  David wasn’t laying down an authorized way of worshipping God; he was freely acting out his excitement to God in the only way he could think of.  He didn’t do something that someone else prescribed, and he didn’t do anything that anyone expected or that God had commanded. Instead, he was simply expressing himself in the best way HE knew how.  
 

In that respect, David’s actions had a lot more Jesus to them than Chris Tomlin or Michael W. Smith.  His wife was right: his display WAS inappropriate, humiliating, socially unacceptable and even a little perverse.  And all of those adjectives can be used to describe Jesus’ ministry when he was here.  He spent time with whores and national traitors, and he taught his disciples that the social norms relating to women and Gentiles didn’t apply to them.  He attacked the religious institution and refused to get bogged down in politics, and he re-defined what it means to have a healthy relationship with God.  In other words, Jesus was a social radical and rebel who showed us that if we are to truly worship God, we’re going to look a whole lot different than the world around us. 

What does that have to do with you and me?  Well, obviously it doesn’t matter too much if we’re overly charismatic in our Sunday song service, so if that’s not you’re thing, that’s totally fine.  More than that, though, I think it’s high time that instead of copying what was radical thousands of years ago, that we thought of life-altering ways to worship God in our own lives.  We don’t have to worry about restrictions that are needlessly placed on us by so many in the church, because our relationship with God is about us and Him, and no one else.  We are FREE in Christ to worship as we please.
 

So… how are YOU going to show God that you appreciate and love Him?
  
4:43 pm 

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Your Preacher, The Heretic!
While researching for last Sunday’s sermon (and by “researching,” I mean, “watching ‘King Arthur’ because it was the introductory video clip”) I came across an interesting aside to the main story in the film.  Arthur, as we’re told, is a devout Catholic, and he follows the theological teachings of a man named Pelagius.  If you’ve seen the film, you’ll recall that the other Catholic leaders are no fan of this Pelagius fellow, and eventually, Arthur is distraught when he learns that his teacher has been killed. 

I can’t speak for the historicity of Arthur, but as it turns out, Pelagius really did exist, and his teachings really did cause quite a stir.  He was most famous for two doctrines in particular: he taught that mankind had free will to choose whether or not they would be saved, and he denied the teaching that is ‘original sin.’  The first doctrine is fairly self-explanatory, but the second, perhaps, needs more explanation.  Original sin can loosely be defined as the idea that every person born into the world inherits the guilt and consequences that resulted from the fall of Adam and Eve (Genesis 3).  This doctrine is widely taught in Catholic and various denominational churches, and the practice of infant baptism has been directly derived from this idea.  Well, when Pelagius taught against original sin and taught that men were free moral agents (the majority of Christians believe that men are pre-destined and therefore have little to no free will), he drew the ire of the Pope and was branded a ‘heretic’ - a dissenter from the truth of the church.
 

I bring these facts up not because I love history (I do not, in fact), but rather, because I have a confession to make: while I do take issue with some of Pelagius’ teachings (as I do nearly every teacher), I happen to agree that he is correct in the two main doctrines that caused his excommunication.  First of all, since the Bible clearly teaches that God wants everyone to be saved and that Jesus died for each person (see 1 Timothy 2:4-6), AND Jesus taught us that not every IS saved (see Matthew 7:13-14), then there is only one conclusion to be made: God has given us the ability to choose for ourselves whether or not we will spend eternity with Him.  And second of all, the very passage that explains the results of Adam’s sin on the human race (Romans 5:12-21) also spells out the fact that what Adam caused for the human race, Jesus erased (see verses 18-21).  So, I am quite confident that we are NOT pre-destined before we are born to go to heaven or hell, and I’m fairly sure that our decision to avoid baptizing infants is a solid one.
 

BUT 

What if I’m wrong?  What if the perspective that I’ve taught from for the last fifteen months is diametrically opposes to the Biblical view?  What if we really ARE pre-destined and we really WERE born sinful?  What then?   Am I going to hell for false teaching (see Galatians 1:8-9)?  Are all of you going with me since you’re following a false teacher (see 2 Peter 2:1-2)? 

These are heavy questions, and rest assured, they are some that have haunted me for quite some time (being in the minority is never a completely comfortable position to be in).  At the end of the day, however, I have to hold on to one fact: I am not saved because I have perfect theology.  Not only that, but I don’t belong to God because I proved to Jesus that I was smart enough.  I am a Christian - a saint whose citizenship is in heaven, a child of my Father who created the universe, a born again, Holy Spirit filled follower of the Savior of the world - for one reason and one reason only: because I have trusted that Jesus is sufficient for my needs, in this life and in the next.  Period. 

One of the verses that has helped me to determine who I am in Mark chapter 8.  In it, Jesus tells the ones he was teaching that, ‘If any of you wants to be my follower, you must turn from your selfish ways, take up your cross, and follow me,’ (Mark 8:34).  In other words, if you want to be a Christian, then be one - it’s not about adhering to a specific set of doctrines, but instead, it’s about living out your relationship with Jesus.  It’s about who you are, NOT how well you can answer theological questions.  It’s about trusting and being obedient to Jesus, NOT perfectly explaining every detail about His nature.  
 

So, if I’m wrong (which, for the record, I’m pretty positive I’m not), my salvation and standing before God is unchanged, because that was never based on my being right or wrong in the first place.  My standing before God was ALWAYS based on Jesus, and my choice as to whether or not I would follow Him.  And right or wrong, heretic or teacher of the truth, I am going to follow Jesus… and I invite all of you to join me.
3:18 pm 

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Say It Ain't So A-Rod...
Obviously, I’m a baseball fan.  Ok, I’m a HUGE baseball fan.  Fine - I probably love baseball too much.  I’ll admit it.  And that means the most recent news coming out of baseball circles has had me thinking a lot.
            

If you haven’t seen the headlines, I’ll fill you in: Alex Rodriguez, perhaps the best player in all of baseball, has admitted to taking steroids over a three year period, from 2001 to 2003.  This is devastating news to an already depressed baseball fan base - A-Rod is currently on pace to blow by Barry Bonds on the all time home run list, and when he does, it has been widely assumed, baseball will once again have a ‘clean’ home run champion.  Well, that hope is officially no more, as Rodriguez has admitted to more than even Bonds ever has about taking performance enhancing drugs.
            

So, what do we make of it all?  Well, in an interview with ESPN.COM yesterday, he gave a somewhat stunning reason for his steroid use:
 

When I arrived in Texas in 2001, I felt an enormous amount of pressure. I felt like I had all the weight of the world on top of me, and I needed to perform, and perform at a high level every day.            

Enormous amount of pressure?  The weight of the world?  That’s a pretty stunning admission considering the circumstances: in 2001, Rodriguez signed a contract to become the highest paid professional athlete in the history of professional sports.  The terms?  Ten years, $252 million!     

Now, most of the time we look in disgust at how much these guys are paid to play a game, and we almost never give them even a little bit of slack to make mistakes.  Well, you’ll have to forgive me, but I actually feel a little sorry for him.  I cannot imagine what it must be like to live up to the expectations of millions of people, ESPECIALLY considering the contract that he signed.
 
           

Pressure and expectations are something we all have to deal with.  No matter how old we are or what profession we work in, there’s always pressure to succeed, to be the best and to be make a name for yourself.  And make no mistake, professional athletes are human, and they’re no different than you and I when it comes to having to deal with this.  I can really empathize with Rodriguez, because I know what it’s like to have pressure to succeed - to get good grades, to hold down a good job, to save money and maintain a home, to be a good husband, to be a good preacher, to see ACC grow, to win people to the kingdom of God.  All of us have been there, and all of us know what that’s like.
 
           

So maybe we should all admit that A-Rod (and others) taking performance enhancers is no worse than when people deal with pressure by getting trashed on the weekend, smoking a carton a week, or yelling at their wife and kids when they get home from work.  Maybe, just maybe, we ALL struggle with dealing with stress, and it’s a tad hypocritical to throw stones at a guy just because we have (falsely) idolized him enough to give him more money than the gross national product of a small nation.   Maybe we should be a little understanding and realize that athletes and celebrities are just like you and me.
            

One last thing: how SHOULD we deal with stress in a healthy way?  Well, the simple answer is still the best.  In Jesus Christ, we find our true identity, and when we belong to God, we ARE good enough, no matter how stressful life gets.  It’s a good thing to be reminded of that every now and then, huh?
3:19 pm 

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

The Single Coolest Thing a Band Has Ever Done
While I love music in a way I can hardly describe, I can also freely admit that most of the time, the music industry is about one thing: money.  Unfortunately, this is usually true no matter what 'scene' you're talking about: radio bands, 'Christian' bands, indie bands, etc.  They're all out to make a buck, and while their art is, at times, stunningly moving, the bottom line is the bottom line.  And that makes what one of my favorite bands is doing that much more amazing.

The band is Mae, and I've been a fan for around five years now.  Their debut was called 'Destination: Beautiful,' and it was just that - beautiful.  I was immediately in love, and while it's been sort of a roller coaster ride with them since that point (they've struggled to duplicate their earlier work), I've stuck with them.  Well, recently, they were dropped from their record label, and that gave them an opportunity to unleash their new passion called the '12 Songs.  12 Months.  One Mission' project.

Here's how it works: every month in 2009, Mae will independently and digitally release a new song.  You can download, and better yet, you can set your price (minimum $1).  The amazing thing?  THE BAND WILL RECIEVE ZERO PROFIT FROM THIS PROJECT!  Instead, every penny their fans pay for these songs will go towards a charity.  The first charity they're working with is Habitat For Humanity, and Mae, along with their fans, will be building a home for Rhonda Floyd, a single mother of two living in Virginia.  The band has really struck a chord with their fans, as they have, to date, raised $8,430.37.  At this rate, Rhonda and her sons will have a home by August.

I'm not sure there's anything else to say - Jesus called us to be the salt of the earth and a light to the world, and these guys are doing exactly that.  While Mae's religious beliefs are their own (they're not always forthcoming with their beliefs, though at least one of their members is an outspoken and committed Christian), they're certainly using their God-given talents to make a difference for people who need it.  I think we can learn a lot from what they're doing, and we can also help them out with their project (and besides - we also get some pretty solid tunes as well!).

For more information and to buy their first song, check them out at www.whatismae.com.
3:02 pm 


Archive Newer | Older